A short little blurb from the Sacramento Bee told how California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed the Stem Cell Affordability Bill this week. This bi-partisan legislation passed overwhelmingly in the State House and Senate. But the governor vetoed it citing the oversight would be too much of a burden on scientists. Poor things.
The bill would have made sure that all Californians, regardless of their ability to pay, would have benefited from any treatments developed through the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM). You may recall the six billion dollar price tag of Proposition 71 for state-funded embryonic stem cell research (ESCR) and cloning a few years back. Apparently, all tax-paying Californians can pay for the research, just not benefit from it.
The bill would also require more oversight for the CIRM, an idea to which they did not take kindly. Why should they have to bothered with more oversight when they've been given $6 billion out of taxpayer pockets? So let me get this straight: If they are rich enough to pay taxes, Californians have to pay for ESCR and cloning. But if they can't afford it, they can't benefit from any of it if cures are ever to be found. At least they can rest assured that the rich won't get any cures from the CIRM either. All the treatment and cures, over 75 to date, lie in adult stem cell research. Sounds like the interest of patients is close bedfellows with the interest of taxpayers in California.
|
|||||
Comments
Re: Schwarzenegger: "Stem Cells for the Rich"
by
Gleb
on Wed 01 Oct 2008 07:44 PM EDT | Permanent Link
Right on Breeder! Sock it to Schwarzenloser
Re: Schwarzenegger: "Stem Cells for the Rich"
by
Caitlin
on Thu 02 Oct 2008 09:32 AM EDT | Profile | Permanent Link
It seems like Schwarzenegger vetoed this bill for two reasons: 1. Because the legislation setting up CIRM was specifically about embryonic stem cells. As Arnold says, “More than 7 million voters were very clear when they passed Proposition 71 in 2004,” Schwarzenegger said. “They wanted to fund embryonic stem cell research that the federal government wouldn’t. And 2. Because the company has to balance patient need and medical research. Again, 7 million voters voted to fund a research institute.
Both reasons actually seem pretty legitimate. The problem here seems to be that Proposition 71 was ever passed in the first place. This is why we have to change people's minds about things like stem cell research, not just try to overlay new legislation over old, harmful legislation. Re: Re: Schwarzenegger: "Stem Cells for the Rich"
by
breeder
on Thu 02 Oct 2008 03:53 PM EDT | Profile | Permanent Link
The House split was 64-7 and the Senate split was 37-1. I think that makes it patently obvious the governor is in the pocket of the biotech industry. Since 2004, there has been irrefutable evidence that adult stem cells are where the treatments lie. That changes things... something which state legislators seem to recognize but the governor does not. Along with $6 billion should come responsible spending. The voters were lead to believe that they would benefit from their money going to ESCR and cloning. This has little to do with medical research. Science for the sake of science is at work here. And taxpayers shouldn't have to bear the brunt of that.
Trackbacks
TrackBack URL: |
The Susan B. Anthony List is dedicated to advancing, mobilizing and representing pro-life women in the political process. Its connected Candidate Fund increases the percentage of pro-life women in politics. Login
Search
Pro-Life Leaders on Capitol Hill
Pro-Life Allies
What we're reading..
Recent Comments
|
||||
